I have been
learning integration technology into art education settings for three week, and
all is going well so far.
In the first model,
I learnt the development of technology in art education. From Sumerian clay
tablet in ca. 2600 BC to Internet in 20st- century, the argument
around the technology has never stopped. That is interesting to look at those
question because some fears that people have had about the negative effects of
new technology on students become true now, and I was inspired those fears and
associate to our reality of education situation. When education try integrate
technology into art education, such as Internet, educator also need consider
the potentially dangerous of technology. For example, students depend on Google
search or Wikipedia too much, and they may be easily affected by false on-line
information. Also, students may divert their attention because they will lack
self-control when they use phone or laptop.
In the model 2, I
discussed the five characteristics Ferdig said are necessary in order to fit
into the constructivist model of learning around evaluating the educational
value of technology. This is my first time learnt it, and I think that is the
most important theory in this model. Ferdig stated the criteria for Internet media
tools application in education, and that is significant for modern education
because we had turned in the digital times, and education need be match with
the realty of today. However, not all of the resources are appropriate for
teaching. By Ferdig criteria, educator can assess new technology tools that may
be various comments from now on.

Hoping everything goes well in the future!

没有评论:
发表评论